6. Rigorous Backtesting for AI Strategies
Introduction
A backtest validates your AI-driven ideas—but improper methodology can lead to “overfitted” strategies that fail in live trading.
Common Pitfalls
-
Look-ahead Bias: Using future data inadvertently in feature creation.
-
Survivorship Bias: Excluding delisted or bankrupt companies from your dataset.
-
Overfitting: Tuning too many hyperparameters to historical noise.
Best Practices
-
Data Hygiene: Freeze your universe at each point in time; include delisted stocks from CRSP.
-
Walk-Forward Testing: Retrain your model every quarter on rolling windows, then test on the next period.
-
Transaction Costs: Model realistic slippage and commissions (e.g., 0.02% per trade).
-
Out-of-Sample Holdout: Reserve the latest 20% of data for final validation only.
-
Robustness Checks: Stress-test under high-vol regimes (2008, 2020) via Monte Carlo simulations.
Case Insight
A momentum strategy showing 18% annual returns in-sample fell to 4% after accounting for realistic costs and walk-forward testing—highlighting the need for rigorous validation.
Conclusion
Meticulous backtesting separates robust, deployable models from historical curiosities—protecting your capital when you go live.
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기